WAYZATA — A Hennepin County judge has voided Wayzata’s short-term rental ban, ruling that the city adopted the measure as if it were a licensing change when it legally functioned as a zoning ordinance and required a different public process.
In an order filed March 30, Judge Joseph R. Klein held that Ordinance 852 “is a zoning ordinance,” that the City of Wayzata was required to follow the procedural requirements for enacting or amending zoning ordinances under the Minnesota Municipal Planning Act, and that because the city did not do so, the ordinance is “void.”
The ruling marks a major turn in a dispute that began last fall after Wayzata moved to prohibit rentals of fewer than 30 consecutive days in licensed rental dwellings.
The ordinance was adopted Sept. 23, 2025, after first and second readings on Sept. 9 and Sept. 23, and published Oct. 2. It changed the city code to require that licensed rental dwellings be occupied only under written leases of at least 30 days and added language stating that no person may lease or allow use of a dwelling unit as a short-term rental. Existing rental licenses held by the plaintiffs were set to expire March 30, 2026, with the ordinance taking effect for existing short-term rentals on April 1, 2026.
Property owners sued in October, arguing the city’s action was not merely a licensing amendment under Chapter 815, but a land-use regulation that should have gone through the zoning procedures required by state law, including a noticed public hearing before the Planning Commission. The city argued it was exercising its police powers and was not required to follow that process.
Judge Klein sided with the property owners on that core issue.
The court’s order does not resolve every question raised in the lawsuits. Klein denied, for now, the plaintiffs’ claim seeking a declaration on nonconforming-use rights, holding that issue was not ripe because the ordinance itself had already been found void. The court also did not reach the takings issue for the same reason.
That means the ruling turns on process, not on whether the city could ever regulate short-term rentals through a properly enacted zoning ordinance or whether any specific property owner has established vested rights.
The litigation traces back to two lawsuits filed in October and November 2025 by Wayzata homeowners seeking relief in district court. Those cases were later consolidated, according to the court’s background summary.
For Wayzata, the ruling is a significant setback in its effort to end short-term rentals through the ordinance adopted last year. For the plaintiffs, it is a clear win on the legal theory that the city changed the rules on land use without using the procedures Minnesota law requires for zoning changes.
Whether the city appeals, restarts the process, or takes another approach to regulating short-term rentals is likely to determine the next chapter in a debate that has already drawn close attention from property owners and city officials alike.









You must be logged in to post a comment.